From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ginsburg v. F.W. Woolworth Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1916
176 App. Div. 882 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

December, 1916.


Our settled practice on appeals from orders has been not to review the discretion exercised by the court at Special Term in granting or in withholding an injunction pendente lite. ( Duryea v. Auerbach, 164 App. Div. 44; Smith v. Smith, 170 id. 950.) No exceptional case to call for a departure from this rule has been made out. Order affirmed, but without passing on the merits, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Thomas, Stapleton, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Ginsburg v. F.W. Woolworth Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1916
176 App. Div. 882 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

Ginsburg v. F.W. Woolworth Company

Case Details

Full title:MAYER S. GINSBURG, Appellant, v. F.W. WOOLWORTH COMPANY, a Domestic…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1916

Citations

176 App. Div. 882 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)