Opinion
7336-23
08-16-2023
ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
Kathleen Kerrigan Chief Judge
On June 1, 2023, respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction on the ground that the Petition was not filed within the time prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.). Although the Court directed petitioners to file an objection, if any, to respondent's Motion to Dismiss, petitioners failed to do so. The record establishes that the Petition was not timely filed. See I.R.C. sections 6213(a) and 7502; Rochelle v. Commissioner, 293 F.3d 740 (5th Cir. 2002) (per curiam), aff 'g 116 T.C. 356 (2001); Hallmark Rsch. Collective v. Commissioner, No. 21284-21, 159 T.C. (Nov. 29, 2022).
Upon due consideration, it is
ORDERED that respondent's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is granted, and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.