From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilton v. Borne

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
Mar 23, 2020
CASE NO. 6:19-CV-00428 SEC P (W.D. La. Mar. 23, 2020)

Opinion

CASE NO. 6:19-CV-00428 SEC P

03-23-2020

PATRICK GILTON v. BORNE, ET AL


MAGISTRATE JUDGE WHITEHURST

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law, and noting the absence of objections to the Report and Recommendation in the record

Gilton's amended complaints appear to address multiple cases in the 16

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this complaint be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failing to state a claim for which relief may be granted.

THUS DONE in Chambers on this 23rd day of March, 2020.

/s/ _________

ROBERT R. SUMMERHAYS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

th Judicial District Court for the Parish of St. Mary. Namely, the original Complaint [1] and initial Amended Complaints [Docs. No. 7, 11, and 13] appear to relate to case number 2019-203969, and the most recent Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 14] relates to case number 2019-204265. The Court finds the reasoning in the Report and Recommendation applies similarly to each of these cases, with the results being the same as to each.


Summaries of

Gilton v. Borne

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
Mar 23, 2020
CASE NO. 6:19-CV-00428 SEC P (W.D. La. Mar. 23, 2020)
Case details for

Gilton v. Borne

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK GILTON v. BORNE, ET AL

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 23, 2020

Citations

CASE NO. 6:19-CV-00428 SEC P (W.D. La. Mar. 23, 2020)