From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilroy v. McCarthy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 13, 1998
254 A.D.2d 325 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 13, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.).


Ordered that on the Court's own motion, the appellants' notice of appeal from so much of the order as granted the defendants' respective motions for leave to conduct further depositions of the plaintiff Frank Gilroy and nonparty witness Peggy Gilroy is treated as an application for leave to appeal from that part of the order, and leave to appeal is granted ( see, CPLR, 5701 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, the Supreme Court properly determined that the physician-patient privilege was waived by the responses of the plaintiffs and nonparty witness, the decedent's mother, made at an examination before trial, relating to the family medical history ( see, Herbst v. Bruhn, 106 A.D.2d 546), and by their disclosure of the family's medical history to various physicians in the treatment of the decedent after his birth ( see, Yetman v. St. Charles Hosp., 112 A.D.2d 297).

Upon finding that the plaintiffs and nonparty witness were directed by their attorney not to answer certain questions concerning "mere facts and incidents of [the] medical histor[ies]" ( Williams v. Roosevelt Hosp., 66 N.Y.2d 391, 396), of the decedent's siblings, the Supreme Court correctly directed the plaintiffs and nonparty witness to appear for further depositions to answer questions previously objected to ( see, Williams v. Roosevelt Hosp., supra; Bolos v. Staten Is. Hosp., 217 A.D.2d 643, 644).

Finally, the defendants successfully demonstrated that the information sought was material and necessary to their defense of the action ( see, Kekis v. Park Slope Emergency Physician Serv., 244 A.D.2d 463), and that the information could not be obtained from another source ( see, CPLR 3101 [a] [4]; Dioguardi v. St. John's Riverside Hosp., 144 A.D.2d 333).

Ritter, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gilroy v. McCarthy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 13, 1998
254 A.D.2d 325 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Gilroy v. McCarthy

Case Details

Full title:FRANK GILROY et al., Appellants, v. EUCHARIA McCARTHY et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 13, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 325 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
678 N.Y.S.2d 644

Citing Cases

Stephen v. State

The witness is not a party to the action, his records were subject to the physician-patient privilege, and he…

Ritter v. Good Samaritan Hospital

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with one bill of costs to the…