From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilmore v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 11, 2011
Civ. No. S-09-2180 KJM DAD (E.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2011)

Opinion

Civ. No. S-09-2180 KJM DAD.

August 11, 2011


ORDER


This case was on calendar on August 11, 2011, for a telephonic status conference. Larry Lockshin appeared for plaintiffs; Michael Johnson and Brian Plummer appeared for defendants.

Based on the discussion with the parties, considering their representations regarding the number and heft of the motions in limine that will be filed, having reviewed the docket of this case, and good cause appearing, the court modifies the schedule as follows:

1. The dates currently set for filing, responding to and hearing motions in limine as well as for trial are hereby VACATED.

2. Hearing on the motions in limine is set for Wednesday, October 12, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. Motions shall now be filed no later than September 14, 2011; oppositions are due by September 28, 2011; and optional replies are due by October 5, 2011.

3. The court will decide whether to bifurcate or trifurcate the trial in conjunction with and following its rulings on the motions in limine.

4. The court will reset the trial date after ruling on the motions in limine and resolving the question of bifurcation or trifurcation, and after any further settlement proceedings are exhausted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gilmore v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 11, 2011
Civ. No. S-09-2180 KJM DAD (E.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2011)
Case details for

Gilmore v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Case Details

Full title:JEREMY GILMORE AND DANA GILMORE, Plaintiffs, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 11, 2011

Citations

Civ. No. S-09-2180 KJM DAD (E.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2011)