Opinion
December, 1906.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Williams and Nash, JJ., who dissented on the ground that the defendant has not been shown guilty of negligence and also because of errors in the charge.
December, 1906.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Williams and Nash, JJ., who dissented on the ground that the defendant has not been shown guilty of negligence and also because of errors in the charge.
Full title:Frederick Gilmore, Respondent, v. The Syracuse Lighting Company, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Dec 1, 1906