From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilmore v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee. at Jackson
Mar 19, 1998
No. 02-C-01-9611-CR-00421 (Tenn. Crim. App. Mar. 19, 1998)

Opinion

No. 02-C-01-9611-CR-00421.

March 19, 1998.

Shelby County, Chris Craft, Judge, (Post-Conviction Relief).

AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 20.

FOR THE APPELLANT:

Deborah M. Henderson, Attorney at Law.

FOR THE APPELLEE:

John Knox Walkup, Attorney General Reporter, Elizabeth T. Ryan, Assistant Attorney General, William L. Gibbons, District Attorney General, Jerry R. Kitchen, Assistant District Attorney General.


OPINION

The appellant, Charlie Gilmore, Jr. (petitioner), appeals as of right from a judgment of the trial court dismissing his post-conviction action after an evidentiary hearing. In this court, the petitioner contends the evidence contained in the record establishes he was denied his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel. After a thorough review of the record, the briefs submitted by counsel, and the law governing the issue presented for review, it is the opinion of this court that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed pursuant to Rule 20, Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals. The evidence contained in the record does not preponderate against the trial court's findings of fact.

The petitioner was indicted and convicted as "Charlie Gilmore." "Charlie Gilmore" and "Charlie Gilmore, Jr." are the same person.

The petitioner claims his lawyer failed to interview two witnesses. The attorney who represented the petitioner testified the petitioner did not provide him with one of the names, and the second witness, the petitioner's sister, could not be located. The petitioner did not know the surname of one witness, but testified he "[could] find out" this person's name. Nevertheless, the petitioner did not present the testimony of either alleged witness during the evidentiary hearing. In short, the petitioner failed to establish he was prejudiced by trial counsel's alleged failure to locate and interview the petitioner's sister. Black v. State, 794 S.W.2d 752, 757-58 (Tenn.Crim.App.), per. app. denied (Tenn. 1990).

The petitioner alleges trial counsel failed to formulate a defense. The petitioner's mother was his chief witness. She died while this case was pending in the trial court. The testimony of the other defense witness was not helpful. The trial attorney testified the chances of the petitioner being acquitted were extremely "dim." Trial counsel was successful in having a twenty-year offer reduced to fifteen years, the minimum punishment for the offense.

The trial attorney did not cause the petitioner to change his plea from not guilty to guilty. The attorney explained the circumstances to the petitioner, provided him with the guilty plea forms, and left the room. When the attorney returned, the petitioner had signed the forms. The defendant was aware of the guilty plea procedure and the effect of such a plea because he entered a plea of guilty to sexual battery three years before the guilty plea in question. The transcript of the submission hearing supports the trial court's findings of fact.

__________________________________ JOE B. JONES, PRESIDING JUDGE

CONCUR:

_______________________________________ JOHN H. PEAY, JUDGE

_______________________________________ THOMAS T. WOODALL, JUDGE


Summaries of

Gilmore v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee. at Jackson
Mar 19, 1998
No. 02-C-01-9611-CR-00421 (Tenn. Crim. App. Mar. 19, 1998)
Case details for

Gilmore v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHARLIE GILMORE, JR., APPELLANT v. STATE OF TENNESSEE, APPELLEE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee. at Jackson

Date published: Mar 19, 1998

Citations

No. 02-C-01-9611-CR-00421 (Tenn. Crim. App. Mar. 19, 1998)