From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilmore v. Ingram

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Aug 17, 2012
ACTION No. 12-1212- MLB (D. Kan. Aug. 17, 2012)

Opinion

ACTION No. 12-1212- MLB

08-17-2012

ANGELA GILMORE, Plaintiff, v. SHELLY A. INGRAM, Defendant.


ORDER

Fourteen days having passed, and no written objections being filed to the proposed findings and recommendations filed by the magistrate judge Kenneth Gale, and after a de novo determination upon the record pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 72(b), the court accepts the recommended decision and adopts it as its own. This case is therefore dismissed, without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated this 17th day of August, 2012, at Wichita, Kansas.

_________

Monti L. Belot

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Gilmore v. Ingram

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Aug 17, 2012
ACTION No. 12-1212- MLB (D. Kan. Aug. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Gilmore v. Ingram

Case Details

Full title:ANGELA GILMORE, Plaintiff, v. SHELLY A. INGRAM, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Date published: Aug 17, 2012

Citations

ACTION No. 12-1212- MLB (D. Kan. Aug. 17, 2012)