Opinion
March 7, 1988
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Wood, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
On June 27, 1986, a judgment was entered granting the parties a divorce and other relief. Therein, the plaintiff's application for counsel and appraisal fees and disbursements was denied "without prejudice to reapply for such relief". In an accompanying memorandum decision, the trial court explained that the plaintiff's application for counsel fees lacked sufficient detail upon which to base an award and the court stated that the plaintiff's request was being denied "without prejudice * * * to reapply for such relief upon the submission of the proper papers". Following entry of the divorce judgment, the plaintiff resubmitted her application and the defendant opposed on the ground that pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 237 (a), the court lacked authority to make such a postjudgment award. The court rejected the defendant's argument and granted the plaintiff's application, and the defendant now appeals.
Ordinarily the trial court lacks the authority to make a postjudgment award of fees of this nature for services rendered prior to the entry of the judgment (Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a]; 48 N.Y. Jur 2d, Domestic Relations, §§ 1337, 1344, at 196-198, 208; Taylor v. Taylor, 120 A.D.2d 355). However, here, the application was made prior to the entry of the judgment and the court specifically retained continuing but limited jurisdiction to entertain the plaintiff's reapplication (cf., Naramore v Naramore, 118 A.D.2d 899). Under these circumstances, the postjudgment award of counsel fees, disbursements and appraisal fees is proper (cf., Sadofsky v. Sadofsky, 78 A.D.2d 520; Riemer v. Riemer, 31 A.D.2d 482, affd 31 N.Y.2d 881). Mangano, J.P., Lawrence, Spatt and Balletta, JJ., concur.