GILMORE v. DJO INCORPORATED

Full title: Andrew Gilmore; and Deirdre Booth, Plaintiffs, v. DJO Incorporated, et…

Court: United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Mar 25, 2009

No. CV-08-1252-PHX-DGC (D. Ariz. Mar. 25, 2009)

Opinion

No. CV-08-1252-PHX-DGC.

March 25, 2009

ORDER

DAVID CAMPBELL, District Judge

Plaintiffs have filed a motion for leave to file an amended complaint. Dkt. #50. The motion is timely. See Dkt. #40 ¶ 2. Defendants do not oppose the motion, and Defendant DJO has filed an answer to the amended complaint (Dkt. #55). The Court will grant the motion. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(2).

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file amended complaint (Dkt. #50) is granted.

2. The Clerk is directed to file the amended complaint filed as Attachment 2 to Dkt. 50.