From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilman v. Knowles

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 27, 2008
No. CIV S-08-0592 JAM JFM P (E.D. Cal. May. 27, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-0592 JAM JFM P.

May 27, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has paid the filing fee.

Since petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondents will be directed to file a response to petitioner's application.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondents are directed to file an answer within forty-five days from the date of this order. See Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Respondents shall include with the answer any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the application. Rule 5, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases;

2. Petitioner's traverse, if any, is due on or before thirty days from the date respondents' answer is filed; and

3. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus on Jennifer Neill, Deputy Attorney General.


Summaries of

Gilman v. Knowles

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 27, 2008
No. CIV S-08-0592 JAM JFM P (E.D. Cal. May. 27, 2008)
Case details for

Gilman v. Knowles

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD M. GILMAN, Petitioner, v. M. KNOWLES, Warden, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 27, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-08-0592 JAM JFM P (E.D. Cal. May. 27, 2008)