From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilman v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 4, 2012
NO. CIV. S-05-830 LKK/GGH (E.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2012)

Opinion

NO. CIV. S-05-830 LKK/GGH

04-04-2012

RICHARD M. GILMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On November 30, 2011, the court issued the report of statistical expert Professor Richard Berk, ECF No. 384. In that report, Professor Berk declared that after a reasonable statistical analysis of the evidence submitted by plaintiff, Professor Berk could not conclude that there is likely to be a risk of prolonged incarceration under the procedural changes in Proposition 9, as compared to the pre-Proposition 9 procedures. The court ordered additional briefing from the parties, which has been received.

On the record presently before the court, plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction must be denied. Nothing in this order should be construed as an opinion on the merits of plaintiffs' claims at trial.

Accordingly, the court ORDERS as follows:

[1] Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, ECF No. 284 is DENIED.
[2] A status conference is SET for April 30, 2012 at
3:30 p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

LAURENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Gilman v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 4, 2012
NO. CIV. S-05-830 LKK/GGH (E.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Gilman v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD M. GILMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 4, 2012

Citations

NO. CIV. S-05-830 LKK/GGH (E.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2012)