Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Gillis v. State

901 So. 2d 124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Gillis v. State

1 Citing case

  1. Gillis v. State

    32 So. 3d 681 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 8 times
    Holding that resentencing from a successful rule 3.800 motion did not toll the time for a rule 3.850 motion attacking the defendant's underlying convictions

    At his original sentencing, Mr. Gillis was not designated as a habitual felony offender on any of the three charges. This court affirmed the judgment and sentence on appeal, and the mandate issued on March 24, 2005. Gillis v. State, 901 So.2d 124 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (table decision). Mr. Gillis subsequently filed a motion to correct illegal sentence under rule 3.800(a).