From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gillingham v. Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 27, 2007
45 A.D.3d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2130 2130A 107939/02 2130B.

November 27, 2007.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan A. Madden, J.), entered February 14, 2007, which granted defendant's motion to reargue a prior order, same court and Justice, entered January 8, 2007, denying defendant's motion to vacate the default judgment and, upon reargument, adhered to the prior determination, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order entered January 8, 2007, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as superseded by the appeal from the order entered February 14, 2007. Appeal from order, same court (Harold Beeler, J.), entered October 19, 2004, which granted plaintiffs motion for a default judgment, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.

The Rice Law Firm, PLLC, New York (Melaine C. Alphonso of counsel), for appellant.

Nelson M. Stern, New York, for respondent

Before: Lippman, P.J., Friedman, Sullivan, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.


Initially, we find that defendant's letter to the motion court seeking clarification of its January 8, 2007 order was essentially a motion to reargue that was granted (CPLR 2221 [d] [2]).

Plaintiffs motion for a default judgment was granted upon his submission of the proof required by CPLR 3215 (f), and the court's reasonable determination that plaintiff had demonstrated sufficient cause for the failure to take proceedings for entry of the default judgment within one year after the default (CPLR 3215 [c]). Accordingly, defendant could only obtain vacatur of the default judgment upon a showing of a reasonable excuse for the default (CPLR 5015 [a] [1]) and a meritorious defense. Since defendant failed to provide a reasonable excuse for his default after being served with the summons and complaint in April 2002, the motion to vacate was properly denied ( see Brown v Suggs, 38 AD3d 329, 330).

We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Gillingham v. Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 27, 2007
45 A.D.3d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Gillingham v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT GILLINGHAM, Respondent, v. GARY ROBINSON, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 27, 2007

Citations

45 A.D.3d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 9327
845 N.Y.S.2d 730

Citing Cases

Ruffin v. Lion Corp.

Lastly, since there is no merit to defendants' contention that this court lacked jurisdiction over them,…

Leon D. Dematteis Constr. Corp. v. Utica Nat'l Assurance Co.

DeMatteis' and QBE's cross motion for reargument to clarify this Court's prior decision dated June 9, 2015 is…