From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilliam v. Crosby

Supreme Court of Florida
May 4, 2004
874 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 2004)

Opinion

Case No. SC03-1122.

May 4, 2004.


Burley Gilliam has filed a successive petition for writ of habeas corpus wherein he challenges the validity of his death sentence underRing v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002). This Court has rejected similar claims in Bottoson v. Moore, 833 So.2d 693 (Fla.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1070 (2002), and King v. Moore, 831 So.2d 143 (Fla.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1067 (2002), and subsequent cases. Furthermore, one of the aggravating circumstances found by the trial court in this case was prior conviction of a violent felony, "a factor which under Apprendi andRing need not be found by the jury." Jones v. State, 855 So.2d 611, 619 (Fla. 2003). Also, Gilliam's speedy trial claim is procedurally barred and without merit. The petition is hereby denied.

WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, C.J., dissents.


Summaries of

Gilliam v. Crosby

Supreme Court of Florida
May 4, 2004
874 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 2004)
Case details for

Gilliam v. Crosby

Case Details

Full title:BURLEY GILLIAM, Petitioner(s) v. JAMES V. CROSBY, JR., ETC., Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: May 4, 2004

Citations

874 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 2004)