From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilley v. State

United States District Court, D. Oregon
May 10, 2006
No. CV. 05-1256-KI (D. Or. May. 10, 2006)

Opinion

No. CV. 05-1256-KI.

May 10, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff brings this civil rights action pro se. On March 2, 2006, I issued an order dismissing plaintiff's claims against the Honorable Stephen L. Gallagher, the Honorable Clifford L. Freeman, and Deputy District Attorney John Horton, on the basis that they are entitled to absolute immunity. Additionally, I dismissed plaintiff's claims against the State of Oregon on the basis of sovereign immunity.

Those defendants now move for entry of judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b). Plaintiff has filed no opposition. I find that there is no just reason to delay the entry of judgment because the issue of the defendants' immunity is not related to the remaining issues in this case and will not result in piecemeal appeals. Accordingly, Defendants Gallagher, Freeman, Horton, and the State of Oregon's motion for entry of judgment is GRANTED.

CONCLUSION

Defendants Gallagher, Freeman, Horton, and the State of Oregon's motion for entry of judgment (#28) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Multnomah County's unopposed motion to extend all deadlines (#31) is GRANTED.

The deadlines are EXTENDED as follows: discovery shall be completed by July 14, 2006, dispositive motions shall be filed on or before August 14, 2006, and the pretrial order shall be filed on or before September 14, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gilley v. State

United States District Court, D. Oregon
May 10, 2006
No. CV. 05-1256-KI (D. Or. May. 10, 2006)
Case details for

Gilley v. State

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN GILLEY, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF OREGON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: May 10, 2006

Citations

No. CV. 05-1256-KI (D. Or. May. 10, 2006)