From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gillette v. VSA Development Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 16, 1998
255 A.D.2d 417 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 16, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Bernhard, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, and the motion is denied.

The Supreme Court erred in granting the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 Lab. (1), as questions of fact exist as to whether (1) the safety device provided by the defendants was so placed as to give proper protection to the injured plaintiff, and (2) the injured plaintiff's own actions were the sole proximate cause of the accident ( see, George v. State of New York, 251 A.D.2d 541; Tsangalidis v. O.K.G. Professional Consultants, 243 A.D.2d 627; Vanerstrom v. Strasser, 240 A.D.2d 563).

Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Thompson and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gillette v. VSA Development Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 16, 1998
255 A.D.2d 417 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Gillette v. VSA Development Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT GILLETTE et al., Respondents, v. VSA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 417 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
682 N.Y.S.2d 597

Citing Cases

York v. St. Mary's R.C. Church

The evidence submitted does not exclude the possibility that some factor other than the alleged violation of…