From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gillespie v. Taylor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Apr 18, 2016
No. 2:14-cv-00062-JE (D. Or. Apr. 18, 2016)

Summary

vacating conviction for a single count in a multi-count conviction and ordering respondent to re-calculate the petitioner's sentence in accordance with the court's order

Summary of this case from Erickson v. Taylor

Opinion

No. 2:14-cv-00062-JE

04-18-2016

BRANDON L. GILLESPIE, Petitioner, v. JERI TAYLOR, Respondent.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge John Jelderks issued a Findings & Recommendation [67] on December 17, 2015, recommending that Petitioner Brandon Gillespie's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [1] be granted, his conviction for Attempted Assault in the First Degree as to Sean Barnett be vacated, and that Respondent Jeri Taylor be ordered to recalculate Gillespie's sentence. Respondent timely filed objections [76] to the Findings & Recommendation. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

When a party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

I have carefully considered Plaintiff's objections and conclude there is no basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. I have also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and find no errors in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks's Findings & Recommendation [67] and therefore, Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [1] is granted. Petitioner's conviction for Attempted Assault in the First Degree as to Sean Barnett (Count Four of the Indictment) is vacated, and Respondent is ordered to recalculate Petitioner's conviction in accordance with this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 18 day of April, 2016.

/s/_________

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Gillespie v. Taylor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Apr 18, 2016
No. 2:14-cv-00062-JE (D. Or. Apr. 18, 2016)

vacating conviction for a single count in a multi-count conviction and ordering respondent to re-calculate the petitioner's sentence in accordance with the court's order

Summary of this case from Erickson v. Taylor
Case details for

Gillespie v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:BRANDON L. GILLESPIE, Petitioner, v. JERI TAYLOR, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Apr 18, 2016

Citations

No. 2:14-cv-00062-JE (D. Or. Apr. 18, 2016)

Citing Cases

Pope v. Franke

The Court does not find any basis, and, therefore, declines to remand the case to the Lincoln County Circuit…

Erickson v. Taylor

When one of several convictions is vacated upon agreement of the parties, the appropriate remedy is not…