Opinion
No. 3D20-914
07-21-2021
Law Offices of Andrew B. Peretz, P.A., and Andrew B. Peretz (Fort Lauderdale), for appellants. Harper Meyer Perez Hagen Albert Dribin & DeLuca LLP, and Roselvin S. Edelman and Michael A. Dribin ; and Berger Singerman LLP, and James D. Gassenheimer and Christina M. Perry, for appellees.
Law Offices of Andrew B. Peretz, P.A., and Andrew B. Peretz (Fort Lauderdale), for appellants.
Harper Meyer Perez Hagen Albert Dribin & DeLuca LLP, and Roselvin S. Edelman and Michael A. Dribin ; and Berger Singerman LLP, and James D. Gassenheimer and Christina M. Perry, for appellees.
Before SCALES, HENDON, and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Paresky v. Miami-Dade Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs, 893 So. 2d 664, 665-66 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (stating that "collateral estoppel applies when the identical issue has been litigated between the same parties and the particular matter was fully litigated and determined in a contest that results in a final decision of a court of competent jurisdiction") (citing Gentile v. Bauder, 718 So. 2d 781, 783 (Fla.1998) ; Dep't of Health & Rehab. Servs. v. B.J.M., 656 So. 2d 906, 910 (Fla.1995) ); see also Mobil Oil Corp. v. Shevin, 354 So. 2d 372, 375 (Fla. 1977).