From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gillaspy v. Cnty. of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 19, 2012
No. CIV S-10-2753 LKK EFB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2753 LKK EFB

01-19-2012

ALEXANDER GILLASPY, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER RE SETTLEMENT & DISPOSITION

Pursuant to the representations of counsel for the parties at a Settlement Conference conducted in Chambers on January 19, 2012, the court has determined that the above-captioned case has settled.

The court now orders that dispositional documents are to be filed not later than seventy-five (75) days from the date of this order.

All hearing dates set in this matter are VACATED.

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY BE GROUNDS FOR THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS ON ANY AND ALL COUNSEL OR PARTIES WHO CONTRIBUTED TO THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Gillaspy v. Cnty. of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 19, 2012
No. CIV S-10-2753 LKK EFB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Gillaspy v. Cnty. of Sacramento

Case Details

Full title:ALEXANDER GILLASPY, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 19, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-10-2753 LKK EFB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2012)