From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gillaspie v. Mackey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Aug 30, 2017
No. 3:16-CV-2833-B (N.D. Tex. Aug. 30, 2017)

Opinion

No. 3:16-CV-2833-B

08-30-2017

ZACHARY DON GILLASPIE, ID # 2055943, Petitioner, v. WARDEN MACKEY, et al., Respondents.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the petition for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED with prejudice.

In accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 22(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) and after considering the record in this case and the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, petitioner is DENIED a Certificate of Appealability. The Court adopts and incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge's Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation in support of its finding that the petitioner has failed to show (1) that reasonable jurists would find this Court's "assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong," or (2) that reasonable jurists would find "it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right" and "debatable whether [this Court] was correct in its procedural ruling." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

If the petitioner files a notice of appeal, he must pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a properly signed certificate of inmate trust account.

SIGNED this 30th day of August, 2017.

/s/ _________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Gillaspie v. Mackey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Aug 30, 2017
No. 3:16-CV-2833-B (N.D. Tex. Aug. 30, 2017)
Case details for

Gillaspie v. Mackey

Case Details

Full title:ZACHARY DON GILLASPIE, ID # 2055943, Petitioner, v. WARDEN MACKEY, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Aug 30, 2017

Citations

No. 3:16-CV-2833-B (N.D. Tex. Aug. 30, 2017)

Citing Cases

Gillaspie v. Ward

The complaint was not also construed as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus because Plaintiff clearly…

Gillaspie v. Ward

The complaint was not also construed as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, because Plaintiff clearly…