From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gillard v. Maly

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 23, 2013
106 A.D.3d 1347 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-05-23

In the Matter of Gary GILLARD, Petitioner, v. John C. MALY, as Deputy Superintendent of Security, Shawangunk Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

Gary Gillard, Attica, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.


Gary Gillard, Attica, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier II disciplinary determination finding him guilty of creating a disturbance. The Attorney General has informed this Court that, during the pendency of this proceeding, the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory surcharge has been refunded to his inmate account. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Santiago v. Fischer, 101 A.D.3d 1206, 1206, 954 N.Y.S.2d 505 [2012];*392Matter of Sykes v. Fischer, 98 A.D.3d 769, 770, 950 N.Y.S.2d 282 [2012] ). Petitioner's request in his reply brief for, among other things, lost wages and copying costs is denied ( see Matter of Harrison v. Brooks, 32 A.D.3d 1087, 1088, 820 N.Y.S.2d 818 [2006] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

ROSE, J.P., LAHTINEN, SPAIN and GARRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gillard v. Maly

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 23, 2013
106 A.D.3d 1347 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Gillard v. Maly

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Gary GILLARD, Petitioner, v. John C. MALY, as Deputy…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: May 23, 2013

Citations

106 A.D.3d 1347 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 3721
965 N.Y.S.2d 391

Citing Cases

Shapard v. Annucci

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the disciplinary determination has since been…

Shapard v. Annucci

In view of this, and given that petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the…