From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gill v. Nakamura

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Jul 24, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-13621-NMG (D. Mass. Jul. 24, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-13621-NMG

07-24-2015

MICHAEL J. GILL, Plaintiff, v. LINDA-MARIE NAKAMURA, Defendant.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE: DEFENDANT'S FIRST AND SECOND MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT (DOCKET ENTRY ## 11 & 20)

BOWLER, U.S.M.J.

Pending before this court are defendant Linda-Marie Nakamura's ("defendant") two motions to dismiss a complaint filed by plaintiff Michael J. Gill ("plaintiff"). (Docket Entry ## 11 & 20). In the first motion, defendant moves to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2) ("Rule 12(b)(2)") and for improper venue pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(3) ("Rule 12(b)(3)"). (Docket Entry # 11). Alternatively, defendant moves to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) ("section 1404(a)"). (Docket Entry # 11). In the second motion, she


Summaries of

Gill v. Nakamura

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Jul 24, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-13621-NMG (D. Mass. Jul. 24, 2015)
Case details for

Gill v. Nakamura

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL J. GILL, Plaintiff, v. LINDA-MARIE NAKAMURA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Date published: Jul 24, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-13621-NMG (D. Mass. Jul. 24, 2015)

Citing Cases

Tomas v. Buckley

"Where, as here, the defendant objects to venue, 'ample authority' exists that the burden of establishing…

Riemer & Braunstein LLP v. Monroe Capital Mgmt. Advisors LLC

The following facts are drawn from the Complaint, the allegations of which are accepted as true for the…