Appellant's Br. 1. Qui tam actions are properly raised in federal district courts and not before the Court of Federal Claims. See LeBlanc v. United States, 50 F.3d 1025, 1031 (Fed. Cir. 1995) ("[Q]ui tam suits may only be heard in the district courts."); see also Giles v. United States, 233 F. App'x 987, 989 (Fed. Cir. 2007) ("This court has construed [the qui tam] statute as conferring exclusive jurisdiction over qui tam claims upon the district courts."). In addition, Ms. Brashear fails to identify a money-mandating source of law for her claims against the United States, despite citing several statutes and constitutional amendments.

Therefore, the Medicaid or Medicare fraud claim must be dismissed. Giles v. United States, 233 Fed. Appx. 987 (C.A. Fed. 2007). 7. Finally, a person's right to review medical records is contained in 16 Del. C. § 5182(14).