Giles v. State

Full title: MICHAEL J. GILES, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court: FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Feb 5, 2019

262 So. 3d 881 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. 1D18-1110

02-05-2019

Michael J. GILES, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Bruce S. Rogow and Tara A. Campion, Fort Lauderdale, for Petitioner. Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Bruce S. Rogow and Tara A. Campion, Fort Lauderdale, for Petitioner.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffectiveness of appellate counsel is denied as untimely, pursuant to rule 9.141(d)(5), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Partridge v. Moore , 768 So.2d 1128 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Even if we were to reach the merits, appellate counsel is not ineffective for failure to raise every conceivable nonfrivolous issue. See Valentine v. State , 98 So.3d 44, 57 (Fla. 2012).

Bilbrey, Winokur, and Jay, JJ., concur.