The New Hampshire Supreme Court has found that money can be a proper subject of a conversion claim. See, e.g., Giles v. Merritt, 59 N.H. 325 (1879) (“The appropriation of the money to her own use by the defendant was a conversion ....”); see also Broadus v. Infor, Inc., No. 18-CV-1079-JD, 2019 WL 1992953, at *5 (D.N.H. May 6, 2019).

Money can be a proper subject of a conversion claim. Giles v. Merritt, 59 N.H. 325 (1879) ("The appropriation of the money to her own use by the defendant was a conversion . . . ."); see also In re BeaconVision, Inc., 340 B.R. 674 (D.N.H. 2006) (denying defendant's motion for summary judgment on claim premised on conversion of $150,000 money deposit). Therefore, Broadus has not shown that Infor's conversion claim fails to state a cognizable claim for relief.