From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilblom v. Gillipsie

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 5, 2010
Civil Action No. 08-1672 (W.D. Pa. May. 5, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-1672.

May 5, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 5th day of May, 2010, after the Plaintiff, Andrew Gilblom, filed a Complaint [Doc. 1] in the above-captioned case, and a Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 15] was filed on behalf of each of the Defendants, a Report and Recommendation [Doc. 25] was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties until April 23, 2010 to file written objections thereto. Timely objections [27] were filed by the Plaintiff. Upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 15] is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the parties desire to appeal from this Order they must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.


Summaries of

Gilblom v. Gillipsie

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 5, 2010
Civil Action No. 08-1672 (W.D. Pa. May. 5, 2010)
Case details for

Gilblom v. Gillipsie

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW GILBLOM, Plaintiff v. WARDEN GILLIPSIE; OFFICER COZART OFFICER…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 5, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-1672 (W.D. Pa. May. 5, 2010)