From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilbert v. Stephens

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Sep 29, 2014
3:14-CV-02635-N-BK (N.D. Tex. Sep. 29, 2014)

Opinion

3:14-CV-02635-N-BK

09-29-2014

CHEECKO GILBERT, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the successive habeas petition is TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3).

Considering the record in this case and pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b), Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Sections 2254 and 2255 Proceedings in the United States District Court, and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), the Court DENIES a certificate of appealability. The Court adopts and incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge's Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation filed in this case in support of its finding that the petitioner has failed to show (1) that reasonable jurists would find this Court's "assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong," or (2) that reasonable jurists would find "it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right" and "debatable whether [this Court] was correct in its procedural ruling." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

If petitioner files a notice of appeal,

( ) petitioner may proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.



(X) petitioner must pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
SO ORDERED this September 29, 2014.

/s/_________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Gilbert v. Stephens

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Sep 29, 2014
3:14-CV-02635-N-BK (N.D. Tex. Sep. 29, 2014)
Case details for

Gilbert v. Stephens

Case Details

Full title:CHEECKO GILBERT, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Sep 29, 2014

Citations

3:14-CV-02635-N-BK (N.D. Tex. Sep. 29, 2014)