From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilbert v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 25, 1995
661 So. 2d 960 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 95-1625.

October 25, 1995.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Paulette R. Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, BASKIN and GERSTEN, JJ.


Appellant, Matthew Gilbert, correctly contends that the trial court erred in sentencing him to consecutive terms of incarceration in the county jail exceeding one year for felony crimes committed in 1993. Where a defendant is sentenced for felony charges only and is not already serving county jail time on another case, incarceration in the county jail may not exceed one year. § 922.051, Fla. Stat. (1993); Singleton v. State, 554 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 1990). Accordingly, the sentence imposed must be reversed and the cause remanded for resentencing pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.988.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Gilbert v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 25, 1995
661 So. 2d 960 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Gilbert v. State

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW GILBERT APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 25, 1995

Citations

661 So. 2d 960 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Meadows v. State

The court also ordered, however, that the county jail terms be served consecutively. It is this latter…

Hayes v. State

The appellee concedes error under Singleton v. State, 554 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 1990). Accordingly, we reverse and…