From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilbert v. Hearn

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 1, 2021
2:20-cv-00384 DMC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-00384 DMC

07-01-2021

MICHAEL GILBERT, Plaintiff, v. HEARN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Good cause appearing, Defendant's motion (ECF No. 21) to modify the discovery and scheduling order dated November 23, 2020, is GRANTED. The deadline to file dispositive motions is extended for sixty days from the date of this order. The Court's previous order (ECF No. 22) granting Defendant's motion incorrectly noted that the motion was Defendant's third request to extend the deadline to file dispositive motions. The motion is actually Defendant's first request for an extension. The Court's prior order is vacated, and this order issued in its place.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gilbert v. Hearn

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 1, 2021
2:20-cv-00384 DMC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Gilbert v. Hearn

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL GILBERT, Plaintiff, v. HEARN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 1, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-00384 DMC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2021)