From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilbert v. Harris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jan 2, 2018
Civil Action No. 17-2624 (UNA) (D.D.C. Jan. 2, 2018)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 17-2624 (UNA)

01-02-2018

CRAIG IVAN GILBERT, Petitioner, v. SCOTT S. HARRIS, et al., Respondents.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Craig Ivan Gilbert's application to proceed in forma pauperis and his pro se petition for a writ of mandamus. Unless a prisoner "is under imminent danger of serious physical injury," he may not proceed in forma pauperis if while incarcerated he has filed at least three prior cases that were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim: 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); see Ibrahim v. District of Columbia, 463 F.3d 3, 6 (D.C. Cir. 2006). This petitioner has accumulated at least three strikes, see Gilbert v. Obama, Misc. No. 14-2096 (D.D.C. filed June 8, 2015), and does not demonstrate that he "is under imminent danger of serious physical injury," for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), the petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis [2] is DENIED. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the mandamus petition and this civil action are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

This is a final appealable Order.

SO ORDERED. DATE: January 2, 2018

/s/_________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Gilbert v. Harris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jan 2, 2018
Civil Action No. 17-2624 (UNA) (D.D.C. Jan. 2, 2018)
Case details for

Gilbert v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG IVAN GILBERT, Petitioner, v. SCOTT S. HARRIS, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Jan 2, 2018

Citations

Civil Action No. 17-2624 (UNA) (D.D.C. Jan. 2, 2018)