From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilbert v. N.Y.C. Hous. Auth.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 17, 2014
116 A.D.3d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-04-17

In re Judy GILBERT, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, Respondent.

Judy Gilbert, petitioner pro se. Kelly D. MacNeal, Acting General Counsel, New York (Andrew M. Lupin of counsel), for respondent.


Judy Gilbert, petitioner pro se. Kelly D. MacNeal, Acting General Counsel, New York (Andrew M. Lupin of counsel), for respondent.

Determination of respondent, dated November 23, 2011, which terminated petitioner's public housing tenancy, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, New York County [Peter H. Moulton, J.], entered January 9, 2013), dismissed, without costs.

Respondent's determination is supported by substantial evidence ( see generally 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176, 181–182, 408 N.Y.S.2d 54, 379 N.E.2d 1183 [1978] ). The record shows that petitioner violated three stipulations barring her grandchildren's father from her apartment because of his illegal drug activities, and that after several incidents, he was arrested in the apartment, which was also found to contain marijuana and crack cocaine (see Latoni v. New York City Hous. Auth., 95 A.D.3d 611, 945 N.Y.S.2d 231 [1st Dept.2012];Matter of Gibbs v. New York City Hous. Auth., 82 A.D.3d 412, 918 N.Y.S.2d 42 [1st Dept.2011] ). There exists no basis to disturb the credibility determinations of the hearing officer ( see Latoni at 611, 945 N.Y.S.2d 231). Furthermore, the record shows that at the time of the hearing, petitioner owed back rent.

The penalty imposed does not shock our sense of fairness. Although the penalty may have significant adverse consequences for petitioner, the other residents of the housing development should not be placed at risk because petitioner was unwilling to exclude an individual who used her apartment for criminal activity over an extended period of time ( see Matter of Cruz v. New York City Hous. Auth., 106 A.D.3d 631, 966 N.Y.S.2d 399 [1st Dept.2013] ). It is further noted that petitioner's record as a tenant was not unblemished in light of her chronic rent delinquency. FRIEDMAN, J.P., SWEENY, ANDRIAS, GISCHE, CLARK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gilbert v. N.Y.C. Hous. Auth.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 17, 2014
116 A.D.3d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Gilbert v. N.Y.C. Hous. Auth.

Case Details

Full title:In re Judy GILBERT, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 17, 2014

Citations

116 A.D.3d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 2676
983 N.Y.S.2d 722