From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gil v. Yates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 23, 2011
CASE NO. 1:09-CV-00552-AWI-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:09-CV-00552-AWI-DLB PC DOC. 49

08-23-2011

FRANCISCO GIL, Plaintiff, v. JAMES A. YATES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Plaintiff Francisco Gil ("Plaintiff") was formerly a California state prisoner. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against Defendant Amadi for deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment and negligence.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to postpone Defendant's motion for summary judgment, filed July 7, 2011. Plaintiff requests an extension of time to oppose Defendant's motion. Plaintiff's motion is unnecessary. No motion for summary judgment has been filed. Defendant Amadi has not filed an answer or other responsive pleading. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion, filed July 7, 2011, is DISREGARDED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dennis L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Gil v. Yates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 23, 2011
CASE NO. 1:09-CV-00552-AWI-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Gil v. Yates

Case Details

Full title:FRANCISCO GIL, Plaintiff, v. JAMES A. YATES, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 23, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 1:09-CV-00552-AWI-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2011)