From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gil v. Peery

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 26, 2015
CV 15-03151-KK (C.D. Cal. Jun. 26, 2015)

Opinion

          Steven H Gil, Petitioner, Pro se, Susanville, CA.

          For S Peery, Respondent: Toni R Johns Estaville, CAAG - Office of Attorney General, California Department of Justice, Los Angeles, CA.


          Present: HON. KENLY KIYA KATO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

          DOCKET ENTRY PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS)

          KENLY KIYA KATO, J.

         On June 1, 2015, the Court issued an Order Directing Petitioner to File Response Regarding Exhaustion, finding Claim Two of the instant Petition to be unexhausted. (Dkt. 12). In the Order, the Court offered Petitioner the option of voluntarily dismissing Claim Two. (Id.). On June 22, 2015, the Court received a " Notice of Dismissal" from Petitioner, voluntarily dismissing Claim Two. (Dkt. 15). However, the Notice of Dismissal is unsigned and is not dated. Petitioner is instructed that if he wishes to voluntarily dismiss Claim Two, he must file a signed and dated Notice of Dismissal form by July 10, 2015. For Petitioner's convenience, the Clerk of Court is instructed to attach a Notice of Dismissal form to this Order.


Summaries of

Gil v. Peery

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 26, 2015
CV 15-03151-KK (C.D. Cal. Jun. 26, 2015)
Case details for

Gil v. Peery

Case Details

Full title:Steven H. Gil v. S. Peery

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jun 26, 2015

Citations

CV 15-03151-KK (C.D. Cal. Jun. 26, 2015)