From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gigliotti v. St. Stanislaus Kostka Roman Catholic Church

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 7, 1999
261 A.D.2d 951 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

May 7, 1999

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Koshian, J. — Summary Judgment.

Present — Green, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Scudder JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff Mary Gigliotti seeks to recover damages for injuries she sustained when she tripped and fell over a defect in the concrete driveway of defendant church. The defect consisted of a five-eighths-inch deviation in the height of two adjoining concrete slabs. Such a small defect is not actionable unless it has the characteristics of a trap, snare or nuisance (see, Tesak v. Marine Midland Bank, 254 A.D.2d 717). Defendants met their initial burden, and plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact whether the alleged defect has the characteristics of a trap, snare or nuisance (cf., Durr v. New York Cent. Hudson Riv. R. R. Co., 184 N.Y. 320, 324-325; Tesak v. Marine Midland Bank, supra).


Summaries of

Gigliotti v. St. Stanislaus Kostka Roman Catholic Church

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 7, 1999
261 A.D.2d 951 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Gigliotti v. St. Stanislaus Kostka Roman Catholic Church

Case Details

Full title:MARY GIGLIOTTI et al., Respondents v. ST. STANISLAUS KOSTKA ROMAN CATHOLIC…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 7, 1999

Citations

261 A.D.2d 951 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
689 N.Y.S.2d 806

Citing Cases

Powell v. Hannaford Bros. Co.

As the defendants demonstrated their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the burden shifted to…