Opinion
No. 65543
12-29-2014
An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR REMAND AND DISMISSING APPEAL
The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal and remand this matter to the district court pursuant to Huneycutt v. Huneycutt, 94 Nev. 79, 575 P.2d 585 (1978); see also Foster v. Dingwall, 126 Nev. 49, 228 P.3d 453 (2010). The motion is accompanied by certification of the district court's intent that upon remand it is inclined to vacate its order granting respondent's motion to dismiss and to "allow litigation to continue consistent with the holdings in the Nevada Supreme Court's SFR opinion."
Cause appearing, we grant the joint motion. Accordingly, we remand this matter to the district court pursuant to its certification, and we order this appeal dismissed. This dismissal is without prejudice to appellant's right to file a motion to reinstate this appeal should the district court decline to grant the relief requested. Any such motion to reinstate this appeal shall be filed within 60 days of the district court's order declining to grant the requested relief. The parties' request to stay the briefing schedule in this matter is denied as moot.
We note that any aggrieved party may file a notice of appeal from any appealable order entered at the completion of the district court proceedings. See NRAP 3A.
It is so ORDERED.
/s/_________, J.
Hardesty
/s/_________, J.
Douglas
/s/_________, J.
Cherry
cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge
Maier Gutierrez Ayon, PLLC
Akerman LLP/Las Vegas
Eighth District Court Clerk