From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gifford v. Bank of America

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Aug 9, 2010
Civil No. 09-639-PK (D. Or. Aug. 9, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-639-PK.

August 9, 2010

E. Clarke Balcom, Clarke Balcom PC, Portland, Oregon, Shannon D. Sims, Attorney at Law, Portland, Oregon, Attorneys for Plaintiffs.

Gregory A. Chaimov, P. Andrew McStay, Jr., Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP, Portland, Oregon, Attorneys for Defendants.


ORDER


The Honorable Paul Papak, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on July 9, 2010. The matter is before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2nd 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983);See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation dated July 7, 2010 (#47) in its entirety.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Bank of America's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (#43) is granted. All claims except the TILA claim for rescission are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs may file an Amended Complaint by September 7, 2010, which corrects the deficiencies in the TILA claim for rescission. If plaintiffs fail to file an Amended Complaint by the deadline, I will dismiss the entire case with prejudice.


Summaries of

Gifford v. Bank of America

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Aug 9, 2010
Civil No. 09-639-PK (D. Or. Aug. 9, 2010)
Case details for

Gifford v. Bank of America

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA GIFFORD and KEVIN GIFFORD, Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

Date published: Aug 9, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 09-639-PK (D. Or. Aug. 9, 2010)