Opinion
December 2, 1993
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.).
The conditional order of dismissal, as against the movant, was within the court's broad discretion where, as here, plaintiff failed repeatedly and without adequate excuse to fully comply with the prior discovery orders (Zletz v Wetanson, 67 N.Y.2d 711, 713). Specifically, there can be no excuse for plaintiff's repeated failure to produce medical bills which support his claim. In the event plaintiff establishes that no tax returns were filed for the relevant period, and that compliance in that respect is therefore impossible, the IAS Court will take appropriate measures in further proceedings.
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Carro, Ross and Asch, JJ.