From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gidney v. Gidney

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division
Apr 25, 2006
Case No. 2:06-cv-92-FtM-33DNF (M.D. Fla. Apr. 25, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 2:06-cv-92-FtM-33DNF.

April 25, 2006


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on consideration of United States Magistrate Judge Douglas N. Frazier's Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 24), entered on April 5, 2006, recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. # 2) be denied and further recommending that this case be dismissed. As of this date, the parties have failed to file an objection to the report and recommendation, and the time for the parties to file such objections has elapsed.

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n. 9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993),aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994).

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings, conclusions and recommendations, and giving de novo review to matters of law, the Court accepts the factual findings and legal conclusions of the magistrate judge and the recommendation of the magistrate judge regarding the motion.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED:

1. United States Magistrate Judge Douglas N. Frazier's Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 24) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED.
2. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. # 2) is DENIED AND THIS CASE IS DISMISSED.
3. The Clerk is directed to terminate all pending deadlines and pending motions and close this case.
DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gidney v. Gidney

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division
Apr 25, 2006
Case No. 2:06-cv-92-FtM-33DNF (M.D. Fla. Apr. 25, 2006)
Case details for

Gidney v. Gidney

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM HAROLD GIDNEY, JR., Plaintiff, v. GABRIELLE GIDNEY, SHANNON…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division

Date published: Apr 25, 2006

Citations

Case No. 2:06-cv-92-FtM-33DNF (M.D. Fla. Apr. 25, 2006)