From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gibson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Apr 20, 1981
614 S.W.2d 234 (Ark. 1981)

Opinion

Opinion delivered April 20, 1981

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK — GOOD CAUSE FOR GRANTING. — There is good cause to grant petitioner's motion for rule on the clerk where petitioner's attorneys admit that the record was tendered late due to a miscalculation on their part.

Motion for rule on clerk; motion granted.

E. Alvin Schay, State Appellate Defender, by: Deborah Davies Cross, Deputy Defender; and Joe Holmes, for petitioner.

Steve Clark, Atty. Gen., by: C. R. McNair, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.


Petitioner, Curtis Gibson, by his attorneys, James D. Gibson and Robert E. Irwin, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorneys admit that the record was tendered late due to their miscalculation of the seven-month maximum limit for filing the record in this Court. See Rule 5, Ark. R. App. P., Ark. Stat. Ann., Vol. 3A (Repl. 1979).

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.


Summaries of

Gibson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Apr 20, 1981
614 S.W.2d 234 (Ark. 1981)
Case details for

Gibson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Curtis GIBSON v. STATE of Arkansas

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Apr 20, 1981

Citations

614 S.W.2d 234 (Ark. 1981)
614 S.W.2d 234

Citing Cases

Shuffield v. State

(Our italics). It is clear that Shuffield sought to appeal his conviction and that he retained counsel in…

Lewis v. State

A statement that it was someone else's fault or no one's fault will not suffice. Moore v. State, 268 Ark.…