From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gibson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Apr 28, 2020
598 S.W.3d 704 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

WD 82487

04-28-2020

Willie J. GIBSON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Susan L. Hogan, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Dora Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Susan L. Hogan, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.

Dora Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Division One: Lisa White Hardwick, Presiding Judge, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge and Thomas N. Chapman, Judge

ORDER

Per curiam: Willie J. Gibson, Jr. ("Gibson") appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion, which claimed ineffective assistance of counsel because trial counsel failed to object on the grounds of insufficient authentication when the State moved to admit a letter purportedly written by him to a co-defendant. Because the motion court did not clearly err when it concluded that Gibson did not sustain his burden to show that he was prejudiced by the absence of an objection, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Gibson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Apr 28, 2020
598 S.W.3d 704 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Gibson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Willie J. GIBSON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Apr 28, 2020

Citations

598 S.W.3d 704 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)