Opinion
5:21-CV-328-CAR-CHW
01-04-2024
BARRY LYNN GIBSON, Plaintiff, v. Warden AIMEE SMITH, et. al., Defendants.
ORDER ON RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
C. ASHLEY ROYAL, SENIOR JUDGE
Before the Court is the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. 131] that the Court grant Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment [Docs. 111, 116]. Plaintiff Barry Lynn Gibson filed a timely Objection [Docs. 132, 133] to the Recommendation. The Court finds Plaintiff's objections to be without merit.
In his Objections, Plaintiff argues, inter alia, that the Magistrate Judge ignored and failed to rule on Plaintiff's motions. [Docs. 132, 133]. The record reflects that all motions have been ruled upon.
Having considered the Recommendation and Objection and conducted a de novo review of the matters raised in it pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the United States Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Recommendation [Doc. 131] is hereby ADOPTED and MADE THE ORDER OF THE COURT. Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment [Docs. 111, 116] are GRANTED, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Defendants.
SO ORDERED.