From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gibson v. Legrand

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 6, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cv-00606-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Feb. 6, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12-cv-00606-LRH-VPC

02-06-2013

LERONE GIBSON, Petitioner, v. WARDEN LEGRAND, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

The court denied petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis (#2) and directed petitioner to pay the filing fee. Order (#3). Petitioner has not paid the filing fee within the allotted time, and the court will dismiss the action.

Reasonable jurists would not find this conclusion to be debatable or wrong, and the court will not issue a certificate of appealability.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the clerk shall add Catherine Cortez Masto, Attorney General for the State of Nevada, as counsel for respondents.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall electronically serve upon respondents a copy of the petition and this order. No response is required.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for petitioner's failure to pay the filing fee. The clerk of the court shall enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

________________________

LARRY R. HICKS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Gibson v. Legrand

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 6, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cv-00606-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Feb. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Gibson v. Legrand

Case Details

Full title:LERONE GIBSON, Petitioner, v. WARDEN LEGRAND, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 6, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:12-cv-00606-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Feb. 6, 2013)