From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gibson v. Freeman

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Nov 19, 2021
1:21CV791 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 19, 2021)

Opinion

1:21CV791

11-19-2021

JOSEPH A. GIBSON, III, Plaintiff, v. CHRIS FREEMAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Loretta C. Biggs, United States District Judge

The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on November 3, 2021, was served on the parties in this action. (ECF Nos. 7, 8.) Plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. (ECF No. 11.) The Court has appropriately reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation and has made a de novo determination in accord with the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. The Court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and/or TRO, (ECF No. 3), is DENIED and that this action is DISMISSED under Section 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim and/or due to judicial and/or prosecutorial immunity, except as to Plaintiff's individual-capacity claim against Defendant Lutz for excessive force (and without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to pursue individual-capacity claims for excessive 1 force and/or deliberate indifference to serious medical needs against unnamed employees of the Rockingham County Detention Center if he later can identify them). 2


Summaries of

Gibson v. Freeman

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Nov 19, 2021
1:21CV791 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 19, 2021)
Case details for

Gibson v. Freeman

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH A. GIBSON, III, Plaintiff, v. CHRIS FREEMAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 19, 2021

Citations

1:21CV791 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 19, 2021)