From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gibson v. Figueroa

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 2, 2021
1:19-cv-00533-DAD-JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2021)

Opinion

1:19-cv-00533-DAD-JLT (PC)

06-02-2021

REGINALD GIBSON, Plaintiff, v. J. FIGUEROA; S. SILVA, Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE

JENNIFER L. THURSTON, CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The parties have filed a stipulation of voluntary dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). (Doc. 38.) The rule provides that a “plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Once a dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is properly filed, no order of the court is necessary to effectuate dismissal; the dismissal is effective automatically. See Com. Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1078 (9th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gibson v. Figueroa

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 2, 2021
1:19-cv-00533-DAD-JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Gibson v. Figueroa

Case Details

Full title:REGINALD GIBSON, Plaintiff, v. J. FIGUEROA; S. SILVA, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 2, 2021

Citations

1:19-cv-00533-DAD-JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2021)