From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gibson v. Farmers' Merchants' Bank of Boley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
May 12, 1925
236 P. 1117 (Okla. 1925)

Opinion

No. 16037

Opinion Filed May 12, 1925.

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Necessity for Motion for New Trial in Time.

Where motion for a new trial is not filed within three days from date of the verdict of the jury or judgment of the court, if the case is tried to the court, and no showing is made that the motion was unavoidably prevented from being filed within the time, the appeal will be dismissed.

Error from District Court, Okfuskee County; John L. Norman, Judge.

Action between the Farmers' Merchants' Bank of Boley and M.A. Gibson. From the judgment, the latter appeals. Appeal dismissed.

J.J. Bruce, for plaintiff in error.

Patterson Dooley, for defendant in error.


This case is appealed from the district court of Okfuskee county. The jury returned its verdict on the 6th day of June, 1924, and motion for new trial was filed on the 10th day of June, 1924, which was one day too late, and there being no showing that plaintiff in error was unavoidably prevented from filing his motion for new trial within the time provided by section 574, Comp. St. 1921. Joiner v. Goldsmith, 25 Okla. 840, 107 P. 733. The appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Gibson v. Farmers' Merchants' Bank of Boley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
May 12, 1925
236 P. 1117 (Okla. 1925)
Case details for

Gibson v. Farmers' Merchants' Bank of Boley

Case Details

Full title:GIBSON v. FARMERS' MERCHANTS' BANK OF BOLEY

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: May 12, 1925

Citations

236 P. 1117 (Okla. 1925)
108 Okla. 268

Citing Cases

Yocum v. Sikkink

It will be observed that the motion for new trial was one day late and there being no showing that plaintiffs…