From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gibson v. Campbell

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jan 20, 2011
Civil Action No. 09-cv-00983-WYD-KLM (D. Colo. Jan. 20, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-cv-00983-WYD-KLM.

January 20, 2011


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's "Objection to Order of Judge Daniel's Dated Nov. 4, 2010". These Objections were filed on both November 17, 2010, and November 29, 2010 (ECF Nos. 151 and 154) and appear to be identical. The Objections were filed to my Order of November 4, 2010, which affirmed Magistrate Judge Mix's Orders denying Plaintiff's Motion Requesting Appointment of Counsel and the Motion to Intervene by Douglas Burns.

I find that the Objections are improper and must be overruled. While a party may object to a ruling by a magistrate judge pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72, there is no basis in the Federal Rules for a party to file "objections" to a ruling by an Article III judge. It is therefore

ORDERED that Plaintiff's "Objection to Order of Judge Daniel's Dated Nov. 4, 2010" (ECF Nos. 151 and 154) are OVERRULED as improper.

Dated: January 20, 2011


Summaries of

Gibson v. Campbell

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jan 20, 2011
Civil Action No. 09-cv-00983-WYD-KLM (D. Colo. Jan. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Gibson v. Campbell

Case Details

Full title:WELLMAN E. GIBSON, Plaintiff, v. ANNA MARIE CAMPBELL, C. HOLST, AIC…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jan 20, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-cv-00983-WYD-KLM (D. Colo. Jan. 20, 2011)