Opinion
No. 2013–2229NC.
03-26-2015
Mecca GIBSON, Appellant, v. Geiger BERNHAR Doing Business as CYCLE CONCEPTS, Respondent.
Opinion
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff commenced this small claims action to recover the sum of $5,000 for defendant's allegedly defective repairs to her motorcycle. After a nonjury trial, the District Court dismissed the action.
In a small claims action, our review is limited to a determination of whether “substantial justice has ... been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law” (UDCA 1807 ; see UDCA 1804 ; Ross v. Friedman, 269 A.D.2d 584 [2000] ; Williams v. Roper, 269 A.D.2d 125 [2000] ). Furthermore, the determination of a trier of fact as to issues of credibility is given substantial deference, as a trial court's opportunity to observe and evaluate the testimony and demeanor of the witnesses affords it a better perspective from which to assess their credibility (see Vizzari v. State of New York, 184 A.D.2d 564 [1992] ; Kincade v. Kincade, 178 A.D.2d 510, 511 [1991] ). This deference applies with greater force to judgments rendered in the Small Claims Part of the court (see Williams v. Roper, 269 A.D.2d at 126 ).
As the court's determination is supported by the record and provides the parties with substantial justice (see UDCA 1804, 1807 ), the judgment is affirmed.
IANNACCI and GARGUILO, JJ., concur.
MARANO, P.J., taking no part.