From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gibbs v. Webb

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 11, 2021
2:18-cv-2817 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2021)

Opinion

2:18-cv-2817 JAM DB P

08-11-2021

ROBERT A. GIBBS, Plaintiff, v. J. WEBB, et al., Defendants.

GARY BRICKWOOD (SBN 94892) BRICKWOOD LAW OFFICE Attorneys for Defendants SHASTA COUNTY, JESSIE WEBB, DAVE KENT, CASEY BARNHART, CHASE REED, and BRANDEN RODGERS


GARY BRICKWOOD (SBN 94892) BRICKWOOD LAW OFFICE Attorneys for Defendants SHASTA COUNTY, JESSIE WEBB, DAVE KENT, CASEY BARNHART, CHASE REED, and BRANDEN RODGERS

[PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER

DEBORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendants have requested a modification of the Scheduling Order (ECF No. 34) to extend discovery and the dispositive motion filing deadline. The request appears reasonable and necessary in order to prepare Defendants' defense. The Court Orders as follows:

IT IS ORDERED:

1. That discovery may be conducted to November 12, 2021.

2. That the date for filing of dispositive motions shall be extended from November 5, 2021 to January 11, 2022.

3. In all other respects, the Scheduling Order (ECF No. 34) shall remain in full force and effect.


Summaries of

Gibbs v. Webb

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 11, 2021
2:18-cv-2817 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2021)
Case details for

Gibbs v. Webb

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT A. GIBBS, Plaintiff, v. J. WEBB, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 11, 2021

Citations

2:18-cv-2817 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2021)