From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gibbs v. Unknown

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 14, 2021
2:21-cv-2023 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-2023 CKD P

12-14-2021

ROBERT A. GIBBS, Petitioner, v. UNKNOWN, Respondent.


ORDER

CAROLYN K. DELANEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has paid the filing fee.

The court requires all petitions for writ of habeas corpus be filed on the proper form which is provided by this court. Petitioner did not use the proper form. Moreover, the court may limit its review of the petition for relief to the information on the form only and need not consider any memoranda or attachments to the petition. See Rule 2(c), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1) is dismissed with leave to amend within thirty days from the date of this order.
2. Any amended petition must be filed on the form employed by this court and must state all claims and prayers for relief on the form. It must bear the case number assigned to this action, must bear the title “Amended Petition” and the form must be filled out accurately.
3. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.
4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner the form for habeas corpus application.


Summaries of

Gibbs v. Unknown

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 14, 2021
2:21-cv-2023 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Gibbs v. Unknown

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT A. GIBBS, Petitioner, v. UNKNOWN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 14, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-2023 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2021)